CBS Evening News Report about Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

While browsing through the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopy (AAGL) website, I ran into an article regarding a report on the CBS Evening News. The link to the report and website is on this page below to the right.

It is interesting that over 600,000 hysterectomies are performed in the U.S. each year. Of these, 75% are performed through a large incision in the abdomen. This significantly increases the hospital stay, post operative pain, and recovery time. Only 15% of hysterectomies are performed laparoscopically.

In other posts on this blog, I have deliniated many of the benefits of laparoscopy over traditional "open" surgery. I strongly believe that there are very few instances that would require an "open" surgery. I have even had patients with a uterus up to the belly button, dense pelvic and abdominal adhesions, and severe invasive endometriosis who have had the benefit of a purely laparoscopic surgery. In three years after fellowship I have only performed traditional surgery on 3 patients, two for medical implications and one at patient request.

The relative scarcity of gynecologists offering laparoscopic hysterectomy is due to many things. I believe that the most prominent of these is the lack of advanced training in laparoscopy and the lack of motivation for gynecologists to learn these skills. As pointed out in the article, transitioning from traditional hysterectomy to laparoscopic hysterectomy will likely be patient driven. The laparoscopic option is often not offered to many patients whose doctor does not perform advanced laparoscopic surgery.

Patients must take an active role in inquiring about the benefits of a laparoscopic approach to surgery. As this happens, physicians will see a want and a need to learn these skills and offer them to patients.

Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Large, Fibroid Uterus

Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

I have already written a post regarding laparoscopic hysterectomy. However, I recently had a patient who presented a difficult challenge. Her uterus was approximately the same size as the uterus of a 16-18 week pregnancy, just below her belly button. For most gynecologic surgeons this large of a uterus would be removed through a c-section type or a vertical incision. I was able to complete the hysterectomy through the laparoscope with only an additional small bikini type incision which was used to remove the uterus.

This particular case was challenging due to the size and shape of the uterus. The uterus was filled with numerous and large myomas, or fibroids. The position of the fibroids made access to the blood vessels supplying the uterus difficult. I had to use a knowledge of the anatomy of the pelvis to dissect out the uterine artery and vein at their origins. This is accomplished by opening the lining of the pelvis and identifying the ureter, blood vessels, and nerves in the area. Once all structures were identified, the uterine artery and vein were clipped with a laparoscopic clip device. This allowed control of the blood vessels supplying the uterus.

Typically with a large fibroid uterus, the veins can be quite distended. Traditional devices used to close the vessels and cut them may be insufficient. In this case I placed a suture into the abdomen and through laparoscopic suturing ligated or tied off the blood vessels prior to cutting them.

With the blood supply to the uterus controlled, I was then able to safely cut the uterus into smaller pieces that would allow it to be removed through the smaller incisions used in minimally invasive surgery. In the case of a supracervical hysterectomy this can be done either with a morcellator or through a mini bikini type incision. For a total hysterectomy the uterus can be removed through the vaginal opening.

Although laparoscopy for a very large uterus may take significantly more time in the operating room, the recovery is much quicker than with open surgery. Patients still usually go home in less than 24 hours as opposed to 3-4 days.

Removal of Cervix after Supracervical Hysterectomy or LSH

I have had a few patients who have presented to me for problems after a supracervical hysterectomy or LSH. This type of hysterectomy is typically performed laparoscopically. The uterus is divided into two portions; the top or fundus, and the bottom or cervix. As described in a previous post in January of 2007, the supracervical hysterectomy can be a good procedure for patients desiring a fast recovery. There is also some benefit by not disrupting the existing supportive ligaments that attach at or near the level of the cervix.

However, up to 30% of patients may need to have the cervix removed at a later date due to continued bleeding, continued pain, or other problems. Most of the patients I have encountered request removal of the cervix due to continued pelvic pain or pain with intercourse after having a supracervical hysterectomy.

Removal of the cervix can be completed by three different methods. It can be removed by vaginal surgery. The risk with this method is the possibility of adhesions to the amputated cervix. Another method is through a laparotomy or large incision. The third method is with the laparoscope. Much in the same way a hysterectomy is performed, the laparoscope allows evaluation of the abdominal cavity for adhesions and also allows completion of all or part of the removal of the cervix.

As with hysterectomy patients are chosen for method of removal based upon their risk of adhesions, continued pain, and amount of cervical descent. Offering laparoscopy allows the physician and patient to choose between all available methods for surgery.